Archive for October, 2009

Book review: What Color is Your Parachute? 2010

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

parachuteWhat Color is Your Parachute? is a wildly successful career guidance book that you’ve almost certainly already heard of. It claims 10 million copies sold, not least because it is updated yearly with new web links and gratuitous references to Twitter.

The 2010 edition is labelled the “Hard Times” edition, and spends a lot more time commiserating the fact that you obviously won’t have a job because the economy is so poor. Notwitstanding this reassurance, it’s hard to see what practical benefit is offered by this focus on the bad economy.

The book’s subtitle hints that it is aimed at “job-hunters and career-changers”, and indeed it is a book of two almost unrelated halves. Many (perhaps even most) people will find themselves needing only one half of the book.

The job-hunting advice is solid, but not ground-breaking. The author emphasises networking and building relationships, and has sensible practical advice on the details. The tone is friendly, light and personable. The advice is mostly uncontroversial, but is distinctive enough to be memorable. All in all, you could do much worse if you need help with seeking a job, although the quantity of content is a little light compared to a dedicated job-hunting manual.

The section on choosing a career is where the book really comes into its own. The author clearly feels that a career should be a passion and manages to strike an encouraging tone. There are a number of well-thought-out exercises that help elicit ideas in an area that often leaves people flummoxed. Again, I was left with the feeling of wanting a little more content than I got in this section.

Overall, there’s a lot right and not too much wrong in this book. It’s well worth the money if you’re troubled by the job hunt or want to get yourself out of a career rut.

But wait! Two flaws…

Firstly, this is a book targetted exclusively at the US market. The majority of the contact details provided, and some of the advice, will be of no use to British readers (who I assume are over-represented in this blog’s audience). For a book that sells so many copies, it’s annoying that a UK edition hasn’t been produced. Even if the changes were mostly in removing irrelevant content without adding much, it would make for a less frustrating experience.

Secondly, the author was once an ordained Episcopalian minister, and some may find his religion shows through rather too much in this book. The main body of the book is fine, but the first appendix dives straight in with the Unexpectedly Capitalised Pronouns. In fairness to the author, he understands that many readers will have a different religious perspective or no religious belief at all, and encourages people to interpret his words into their own world view. Nevertheless, the appendix on the Mission that He has provided you in His infinite goodness will polarise the readership, and many people will find it distasteful.

Personally I was happy to see an author speaking from the heart, and felt that this made for a better chance of insight than a soulless politically-correct tract with all the passion carefully removed so as not to cause offence. Having said that, I’ve worked harder to understand religious belief than many atheists, and I found it heavy going and ultimately impossible to connect with. If this ruins the book for you, then you’re probably too sensitive, but don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Changing Wordpress theme switches off Google Analytics

Monday, October 19th, 2009

I’ve been wondering why the number of visitors reported by Google Analytics has fallen off a cliff, and to my surprise it’s not (just) due to boring content. It turns out that not all Wordpress themes are compatible with the Google Analytics plugin, and I’d switched to one that wasn’t compatible. This is surprising, but in retrospect probably not unreasonable.

Random thoughts

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

It irks me when people use the word “random” as I have in the title to this article. As any cryptologist will tell you, human thoughts are never statistically random, which is why we are so poor at picking passwords that can’t be guessed. To me, the word “haphazard” seems much better at describing the process of collecting thoughts together with no clear goal or purpose.

A little digging in the OED informed me that I am not actually correct in this pedantry. “Random” is a perfectly acceptable adjective meaning “arranged without goal or purpose”, in which form its use dates to the mid-17th century (so it isn’t a modern corruption). In point of fact, “haphazard” entered the language slightly later in the same century, and in this sense the words are synonymous.

However, I wonder if it wouldn’t be useful to enforce more of a distinction in the future, whatever the history of the language. Statistical randomness is a sense of “random” that came into use in the 19th century, but is increasingly important in modern times as we are persuaded of this fact or that fact by use of statistical analysis. If a drug is declared safe on the basis of “random” trials, you had better hope they are not merely haphazard.